↓ Skip to main content

Forum: Coding in Tongues: Developing Non-English Coding Schemes for Leadership Profiling

Overview of attention for article published in Mershon International Studies Review, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 476)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forum: Coding in Tongues: Developing Non-English Coding Schemes for Leadership Profiling
Published in
Mershon International Studies Review, February 2020
DOI 10.1093/isr/viaa001
Authors

Klaus Brummer, Michael D Young, Özgur Özdamar, Sercan Canbolat, Consuelo Thiers, Christian Rabini, Katharina Dimmroth, Mischa Hansel, Ameneh Mehvar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,220,872
of 15,371,744 outputs
Outputs from Mershon International Studies Review
#50
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,645
of 250,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mershon International Studies Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,371,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them