↓ Skip to main content

MetaDisorder: a meta-server for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
303 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MetaDisorder: a meta-server for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukasz P Kozlowski, Janusz M Bujnicki

Abstract

Intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) lack a well-defined three-dimensional structure. Some of them may assume a locally stable structure under specific conditions, e.g. upon interaction with another molecule, while others function in a permanently unstructured state. The discovery of IUPs challenged the traditional protein structure paradigm, which stated that a specific well-defined structure defines the function of the protein. As of December 2011, approximately 60 methods for computational prediction of protein disorder from sequence have been made publicly available. They are based on different approaches, such as utilizing evolutionary information, energy functions, and various statistical and machine learning methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 4 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 175 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 27%
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 30%
Chemistry 13 7%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,677,820
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,289
of 7,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,566
of 168,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#25
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.