↓ Skip to main content

Understanding usual care in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: A multi-method approach

Overview of attention for article published in Palliative Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding usual care in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: A multi-method approach
Published in
Palliative Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1177/0269216320905064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emel Yorganci, Catherine J Evans, Halle Johnson, Stephen Barclay, Fliss EM Murtagh, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, Andrew Pickles, Jonathan Koffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,131,947
of 15,964,783 outputs
Outputs from Palliative Medicine
#544
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,752
of 256,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palliative Medicine
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,964,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.