You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacological interventions for borderline personality disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005653.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jutta Stoffers, Birgit A Völlm, Gerta Rücker, Antje Timmer, Nick Huband, Klaus Lieb |
| Abstract |
Drugs are widely used in borderline personality disorder (BPD) treatment, chosen because of properties known from other psychiatric disorders ("off-label use"), mostly targeting affective or impulsive symptom clusters. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 599 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 81 | 13% |
| Researcher | 60 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 8% |
| Other | 122 | 20% |
| Unknown | 156 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 212 | 35% |
| Psychology | 105 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 8% |
| Unknown | 168 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,425,919
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,014
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,113
of 97,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.