↓ Skip to main content

Formal or Functional? Traditional or Inclusive? Bible Translations as Markers of Religious Subcultures

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Religion, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 384)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formal or Functional? Traditional or Inclusive? Bible Translations as Markers of Religious Subcultures
Published in
Sociology of Religion, February 2020
DOI 10.1093/socrel/sraa003
Authors

Samuel L Perry, Joshua B Grubbs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#609,138
of 15,571,165 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Religion
#33
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,699
of 252,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Religion
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,571,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them