↓ Skip to main content

Oxytocin augmentation of labour in women with epidural analgesia for reducing operative deliveries

Overview of attention for article published in this source, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxytocin augmentation of labour in women with epidural analgesia for reducing operative deliveries
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009241.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Costley, Philippa L, East, Christine E

Abstract

The rate of operative deliveries (both caesarean sections, vacuum extractions and forceps), continues to rise throughout the world. These are associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. The most common reasons for operative births in nulliparous women are labour dystocia (failure to progress), and non-reassuring fetal status. Epidural analgesia has been shown to slow the progress of labour, as well as increase the rate of instrumental deliveries. However, it is unclear whether the use of oxytocin in women with epidural analgesia results in a reduction in operative deliveries, and thereby reduces both maternal and fetal morbidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 26%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%