You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Techniques for Small Non-Coding RNA Analysis in Seeds of Forest Tree Species
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 15 |
Book title |
Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0179-2_15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160178-5, 978-1-07-160179-2
|
Authors |
Yang Liu, Yousry A. El-Kassaby, Liu, Yang, El-Kassaby, Yousry A. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 50% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,325,871
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,303
of 362,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.