↓ Skip to main content

Ex-appraisal bias: Negative illusions in appraising relationship quality retrospectively

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ex-appraisal bias: Negative illusions in appraising relationship quality retrospectively
Published in
Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, February 2020
DOI 10.1177/0265407520907150
Authors

Aidan P. J. Smyth, Johanna Peetz, Adrienne A. Capaldi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#916,069
of 15,550,854 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social & Personal Relationships
#190
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,332
of 252,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social & Personal Relationships
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,550,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.