↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation study
Published in
Critical Care, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3809
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Christiaan Boerma, Keshen R Mathura, Peter HJ van der Voort, Peter E Spronk, Can Ince

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 39 33%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 68%
Engineering 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,884
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,763
of 70,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.