↓ Skip to main content

Good Research Practice in Non-Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 284: Minimum Information and Quality Standards for Conducting, Reporting, and Organizing In Vitro Research.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Minimum Information and Quality Standards for Conducting, Reporting, and Organizing In Vitro Research.
Chapter number 284
Book title
Good Research Practice in Non-Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedicine
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/164_2019_284
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-033655-4, 978-3-03-033656-1
Authors

Christoph H. Emmerich, Christopher M. Harris

Abstract

Insufficient description of experimental practices can contribute to difficulties in reproducing research findings. In response to this, "minimum information" guidelines have been developed for different disciplines. These standards help ensure that the complete experiment is described, including both experimental protocols and data processing methods, allowing a critical evaluation of the whole process and the potential recreation of the work. Selected examples of minimum information checklists with relevance for in vitro research are presented here and are collected by and registered at the MIBBI/FAIRsharing Information Resource portal.In addition, to support integrative research and to allow for comparisons and data sharing across studies, ontologies and vocabularies need to be defined and integrated across areas of in vitro research. As examples, this chapter addresses ontologies for cells and bioassays and discusses their importance for in vitro studies.Finally, specific quality requirements for important in vitro research tools (like chemical probes, antibodies, and cell lines) are suggested, and remaining issues are discussed.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,668,471
of 15,077,480 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#114
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,135
of 344,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,077,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.