↓ Skip to main content

Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000515.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy D Müller, Philippe Lyrer, Martin M Brown, Leo H Bonati

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Japan 5 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 228 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 21%
Other 35 14%
Student > Postgraduate 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 72 29%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 36 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,036,031
of 16,225,653 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,823
of 11,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,359
of 256,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,225,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.