You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolically healthy obese and metabolic syndrome of the lean: the importance of diet quality. Analysis of MAGNETIC cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00532-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamila Osadnik, Tadeusz Osadnik, Marta Lonnie, Mateusz Lejawa, Rafał Reguła, Martyna Fronczek, Marcin Gawlita, Lidia Wądołowska, Mariusz Gąsior, Natalia Pawlas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 38% |
| Peru | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,614,718
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#790
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,396
of 360,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.