You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metal-organic frameworks as kinetic modulators for branched selectivity in hydroformylation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14828-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald Bauer, Daniele Ongari, Davide Tiana, Patrick Gäumann, Thomas Rohrbach, Gerard Pareras, Mohamed Tarik, Berend Smit, Marco Ranocchiari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 33 | 50% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,395,147
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#20,784
of 57,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,607
of 383,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#613
of 1,453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.