@kckong3 Since Covid-19 mostly settled down at lung, I do think CT is the best option. But it takes time and expensive, 1000k+. https://t.co/jo7lvk1snG
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
@HelkaParviainen Thoughts? See also : https://t.co/AjxVsG0vRP and https://t.co/KSe3yNGXGN
@TeemuVKarjalain CT seems to pick up COVID before PCR : https://t.co/AjxVsG0vRP
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @mido4299: @Tomo20309138 PCRよりCT検査の方が感度が高いという論文は複数ありそうです。 https://t.co/RJxau7JT7H https://t.co/lSKnTQqygv https://t.co/b2sqUKaahx
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
@DarthDraghi @james_riney @GearoidReidy I thought it was the other way around. CT scans have higher false positives probably due to CT images have difficulty differencing various kinds of viral pneumonia. Source: https://t.co/dIPnDCQrHX
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
“Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of COVID-19. Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas.” https://t.co/SyutXKxqE7
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @Martin_Martin_G: @AntoninoSpin Spot On https://t.co/0yOqjpjNN2
RT @ShariqShamimMD: One can have #COVID19 even with negative PCR and CT. Above case is an example why/how asymptomatic people are spreading…
@JapanIntercult @clpearce Here's a paper on CT-scan versus the Covid-19 swab test (RT-PCR test) https://t.co/xVO10AZ7Iq When comparing tests between countries, there are many factors to consider that are far more important that the number of tests. eg. How
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @rsilvarino: https://t.co/bHzfTZ7Mwh En este contexto epidemiologico deberemos manejar a todos los pacientes con infiltrados bilaterales…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @rsilvarino: https://t.co/bHzfTZ7Mwh En este contexto epidemiologico deberemos manejar a todos los pacientes con infiltrados bilaterales…
Great study - confirms that “testing” is nearly useless as PCR method was not sensitive for detecting #COVID19
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @ShariqShamimMD: One can have #COVID19 even with negative PCR and CT. Above case is an example why/how asymptomatic people are spreading…
Interesting study out of China. Limited data, but found chest CT to be significantly more sensitive than the RT-PCR test. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https
Unfortunately there is a lot of misunderstanding even among clinicians and hospital admin about false negative rate of Covid RT-PCR. Front line staff seem to understand this data well. Everyone else? Not sure. Thank you, this is why I love #MedTwitte
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/yplSaud2tQ
RT @rsilvarino: https://t.co/bHzfTZ7Mwh En este contexto epidemiologico deberemos manejar a todos los pacientes con infiltrados bilaterales…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
One can have #COVID19 even with negative PCR and CT. Above case is an example why/how asymptomatic people are spreading the disease. @CMichaelGibson @EM_RESUS @EricTopol @DrMarthaGulati @mmamas1973 @SVRaoMD @smithECGBlog @FatEmperor https://t.co/9exKZimE
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @mizuhoo8: #PCR検査 で陰性だった患者の75%が、CT検査では陽性だった。PCR検査のみを拡大することは有害。 https://t.co/F46i1G0P1O
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
Of 413 patients with negative RT-PCR result, 75% (308/413) had positive chest CT scans. https://t.co/i2rn80QuBF
https://t.co/bHzfTZ7Mwh En este contexto epidemiologico deberemos manejar a todos los pacientes con infiltrados bilaterales como si tuvieran COVID, independientemente del PCR. https://t.co/XvZnrc5R0X
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/naJGcc5HNy
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
Según este estudio, los falsos negativos con el metodo pcr son 3% (muy preciso) La probabilidad que le hayan hecho el test a él y a la esposa correctamente y el resultado fuera errado en los dos, por el método mismo es es de 3%x3% = 0.9% https://t.co/e0
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @Enddenji: @qqolea @KGN_works @westinghouse565 この論文の追試が世界中で行われてるんだが、少なくとも、あんたの説はどこにも見つからんのだが…? CTが見逃した患者は 21/1049 PCRが見逃した患者は 413/1049…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/YUzaWXRIyl
RT @leticiakawano: 1/CoV2 RT-PCR pitfalls: In this retrospective chinese cohort study, 1049 pts w CT and PCR performed (within 7d from each…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @Martin_Martin_G: CT vs PCR preop: https://t.co/0yOqjpjNN2 @aecirujanos
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
@realBrookA @fitse_t @seadamaru Take a look at this Study >>> Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/gtQqryldEo
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
Good clinical reminder for HCPs #COVID19
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
@NTakahashiRad @photoncounting https://t.co/dhwDuHTlLz この論文ではCT positive/PCR negativeが結構いますね。逆は少ないようです。CTの感度は97%、特異度は25%と結論づけられています。
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
@SanjatKanjilal Consistent with https://t.co/6CObLM1fwk + https://t.co/m3XlxrCYS2 Tough as sensitivity can refer to analytic sens (rtPCR almost certainly great) or clinical (for dz/symptoms or for transmissibility - may not be the same, and almost certain
RT @leticiakawano: 1/CoV2 RT-PCR pitfalls: In this retrospective chinese cohort study, 1049 pts w CT and PCR performed (within 7d from each…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
@sietskerozie @MauricevdBosch @jankluytmans @olvg Waarsch wordt hier naar gehandeld. https://t.co/jXTYRes8eU
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
Just because the test is negative doesn’t mean the patient isn’t C19+ #clinicalsuspicion #multipletests #COVID19
Clinical suspicion so important with #COVIDー19 &particularly as its becoming endemic (in hospital admissions at least) Thanks for the reminder @RogueRad that tests have false negatives Everyone needs to act like they have #coronavirus & HPs need t
RT @MikeIvyMD: Important to recognize as Covid becomes much more common here, the RT-PCR is only about 65-70% sensitive.
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
RT @Martin_Martin_G: CT vs PCR preop: https://t.co/0yOqjpjNN2 @aecirujanos
RT @RogueRad: Most important numbers for COVID-testing debate. (yes, retrospective, limitations, dichotomania, blah, blah, blah). Both nega…
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…