↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support course

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support course
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e3182417709
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Cheng, David L. Rodgers, Élise van der Jagt, Walter Eppich, John O’Donnell

Abstract

To describe the history of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support course and outline the new developments in instructor training that will impact the way debriefing is conducted during Pediatric Advanced Life Support courses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Other 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 33 30%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,834,945
of 21,223,235 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#1,621
of 3,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,477
of 143,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#8
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,223,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.