You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sana Ishaque, Larissa Shamseer, Cecilia Bukutu, Sunita Vohra |
| Abstract |
Rhodiola rosea (R. rosea) is grown at high altitudes and northern latitudes. Due to its purported adaptogenic properties, it has been studied for its performance-enhancing capabilities in healthy populations and its therapeutic properties in a number of clinical populations. To systematically review evidence of efficacy and safety of R. rosea for physical and mental fatigue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#179,315
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#32
of 3,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#738
of 171,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.