↓ Skip to main content

Incumbency advantage and shocks in the electorate: the adoption of voluntary voting

Overview of attention for article published in European Political Science Review, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 228)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
Title
Incumbency advantage and shocks in the electorate: the adoption of voluntary voting
Published in
European Political Science Review, February 2020
DOI 10.1017/s1755773920000041
Authors

Pablo Argote

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,323,825
of 15,063,129 outputs
Outputs from European Political Science Review
#41
of 228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,626
of 246,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Political Science Review
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,063,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.