You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of stakeholder perspectives on cost-effectiveness estimates of four specialized nutritious foods for preventing stunting and wasting in children 6–23 months in Burkina Faso
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00535-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye Shen, Ilana R. Cliffer, Devika J. Suri, Breanne K. Langlois, Stephen A. Vosti, Patrick Webb, Beatrice L. Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 84 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,370,242
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#918
of 1,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,154
of 383,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.