You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30074-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel Hellewell, Sam Abbott, Amy Gimma, Nikos I Bosse, Christopher I Jarvis, Timothy W Russell, James D Munday, Adam J Kucharski, W John Edmunds, Sebastian Funk, Rosalind M Eggo, Fiona Sun, Stefan Flasche, Billy J Quilty, Nicholas Davies, Yang Liu, Samuel Clifford, Petra Klepac, Mark Jit, Charlie Diamond, Hamish Gibbs, Kevin van Zandvoort |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,262 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 186 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 172 | 8% |
| Spain | 161 | 7% |
| Japan | 122 | 5% |
| Italy | 65 | 3% |
| Canada | 58 | 3% |
| Australia | 28 | 1% |
| Mexico | 26 | 1% |
| France | 26 | 1% |
| Other | 303 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1115 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1847 | 82% |
| Scientists | 248 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 140 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,052 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3052 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 409 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 395 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 292 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 252 | 8% |
| Other | 185 | 6% |
| Other | 712 | 23% |
| Unknown | 807 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 581 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 187 | 6% |
| Engineering | 142 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 130 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 120 | 4% |
| Other | 889 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1003 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2403. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,144
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#7
of 3,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186
of 373,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.