↓ Skip to main content

Mid-way and post-intervention effects on potential determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior, results of the HEIA study - a multi-component school-based randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mid-way and post-intervention effects on potential determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior, results of the HEIA study - a multi-component school-based randomized trial
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingunn H Bergh, Mona Bjelland, May Grydeland, Nanna Lien, Lene F Andersen, Knut-Inge Klepp, Sigmund A Anderssen, Yngvar Ommundsen

Abstract

There is limited knowledge as to whether obesity prevention interventions are able to produce change in the determinants hypothesized to precede change in energy balance-related behaviors in young people. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multi-component intervention on a wide range of theoretically informed determinants of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). Moderation effects of gender, weight status and parental education level and whether the perceived intervention dose received influenced the effects were also explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 299 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 16%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Social Sciences 35 11%
Sports and Recreations 28 9%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 80 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,952
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,081
of 178,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.