The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians' Conscience-Based Refusals?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Kogan, Katherine L Kraschel, Claudia E Haupt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#56,386
of 26,604,138 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#10
of 2,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,694
of 387,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,604,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.