You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissimilation of synonymous codon usage bias in virus–host coevolution due to translational selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-020-1124-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng Chen, Peng Wu, Shuyun Deng, Heng Zhang, Yutong Hou, Zheng Hu, Jianzhi Zhang, Xiaoshu Chen, Jian-Rong Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,760,667
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,690
of 2,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,667
of 365,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#65
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 150.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.