↓ Skip to main content

Dissimilation of synonymous codon usage bias in virus–host coevolution due to translational selection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissimilation of synonymous codon usage bias in virus–host coevolution due to translational selection
Published in
Nature Ecology & Evolution, March 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41559-020-1124-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Chen, Peng Wu, Shuyun Deng, Heng Zhang, Yutong Hou, Zheng Hu, Jianzhi Zhang, Xiaoshu Chen, Jian-Rong Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,541,647
of 15,922,732 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#1,051
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,938
of 257,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#51
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,732 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.