You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacts of food contact chemicals on human health: a consensus statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-020-0572-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Muncke, Anna-Maria Andersson, Thomas Backhaus, Justin M. Boucher, Bethanie Carney Almroth, Arturo Castillo Castillo, Jonathan Chevrier, Barbara A. Demeneix, Jorge A. Emmanuel, Jean-Baptiste Fini, David Gee, Birgit Geueke, Ksenia Groh, Jerrold J. Heindel, Jane Houlihan, Christopher D. Kassotis, Carol F. Kwiatkowski, Lisa Y. Lefferts, Maricel V. Maffini, Olwenn V. Martin, John Peterson Myers, Angel Nadal, Cristina Nerin, Katherine E. Pelch, Seth Rojello Fernández, Robert M. Sargis, Ana M. Soto, Leonardo Trasande, Laura N. Vandenberg, Martin Wagner, Changqing Wu, R. Thomas Zoeller, Martin Scheringer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 19% |
| Germany | 6 | 10% |
| Turkey | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 64% |
| Scientists | 15 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 336 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 148 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 70 | 21% |
| Unknown | 162 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#264,260
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#85
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,545
of 385,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.