You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Kea show three signatures of domain-general statistical inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14695-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amalia P. M. Bastos, Alex H. Taylor |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 446 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 43 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 41 | 9% |
| United States | 32 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 20 | 4% |
| Australia | 12 | 3% |
| Canada | 11 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 41 | 9% |
| Unknown | 226 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 349 | 78% |
| Scientists | 72 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 22% |
| Psychology | 17 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1870. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,937
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#88
of 52,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196
of 365,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#4
of 1,387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.