You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Illness-related suffering and need for palliative care in Rohingya refugees and caregivers in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Doherty, Liam Power, Mila Petrova, Scott Gunn, Richard Powell, Rachel Coghlan, Liz Grant, Brett Sutton, Farzana Khan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Bangladesh | 2 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 119 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 13% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 127 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#890,510
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,372
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,884
of 384,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#17
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.