↓ Skip to main content

Fiber intake and total and cause-specific mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fiber intake and total and cause-specific mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 2012
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.111.028415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Chun Chuang, Teresa Norat, Neil Murphy, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Florence Perquier, Laureen Dartois, Rudolf Kaaks, Birgit Teucher, Manuela M Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Sara Grioni, Carlotta Sacerdote, Salvatore Panico, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Petra HM Peeters, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Martine M Ros, Magritt Brustad, Lene Angell Åsli, Guri Skeie, J Ramón Quirós, Carlos A González, María-José Sánchez, Carmen Navarro, Eva Ardanaz Aicua, Miren Dorronsoro, Isabel Drake, Emily Sonestedt, Ingegerd Johansson, Göran Hallmans, Timothy Key, Francesca Crowe, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas Wareham, Pietro Ferrari, Nadia Slimani, Isabelle Romieu, Valentina Gallo, Elio Riboli, Paolo Vineis

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that high fiber intake is associated with lower mortality. However, little is known about the association of dietary fiber with specific causes of death other than cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Cyprus 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 87 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Unspecified 9 9%
Other 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Unspecified 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#754,398
of 13,304,005 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,898
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,277
of 121,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#19
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,304,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.