↓ Skip to main content

GPs’ understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: an online survey

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
149 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
GPs’ understanding of the benefits and harms of treatments for long-term conditions: an online survey
Published in
BJGP Open, March 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Treadwell, Julian Stephen, Wong, Geoff, Milburn-Curtis, Coral, Feakins, Benjamin, Greenhalgh, Trisha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#149,502
of 15,184,391 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#2
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,716
of 249,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them