You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt? Performance Evaluations, Medical Errors, and the Production of Gender Inequality in Emergency Medical Education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Sociological Review, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0003122420907066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra Brewer, Melissa Osborne, Anna S. Mueller, Daniel M. O’Connor, Arjun Dayal, Vineet M. Arora |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 52% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 50% |
| Scientists | 26 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#665,832
of 25,935,829 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#235
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,143
of 387,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,935,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.