↓ Skip to main content

Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007957.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A Smart, Belinda J Marshall, Maxine Daley, Elie Boulos, Janelle Windus, Nadine Baker, Nigel Kwok

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia, characterised by raised blood cholesterol levels, is not a disease itself but a metabolic derangement that often contributes to many diseases, notably cardiovascular disease. In most cases, elevated cholesterol levels are associated with high-fat diet, especially saturated fat, coupled with an inactive lifestyle. Less commonly, raised cholesterol may be related to an inherited disorder, familial hypercholesterolaemia. This systematic review is only concerned with acquired hypercholesterolaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,630,916
of 13,763,586 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,296
of 10,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,147
of 122,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,763,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.