↓ Skip to main content

Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-fat diets for acquired hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007957.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil A Smart, Belinda J Marshall, Maxine Daley, Elie Boulos, Janelle Windus, Nadine Baker, Nigel Kwok

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia, characterised by raised blood cholesterol levels, is not a disease itself but a metabolic derangement that often contributes to many diseases, notably cardiovascular disease. In most cases, elevated cholesterol levels are associated with high-fat diet, especially saturated fat, coupled with an inactive lifestyle. Less commonly, raised cholesterol may be related to an inherited disorder, familial hypercholesterolaemia. This systematic review is only concerned with acquired hypercholesterolaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 21%
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 27 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,829,753
of 16,177,747 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,577
of 11,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,317
of 128,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,177,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.