You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Usability Issues of Clinical and Research Applications of Virtual Reality in Older People: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cosimo Tuena, Elisa Pedroli, Pietro Davide Trimarchi, Alessia Gallucci, Mattia Chiappini, Karine Goulene, Andrea Gaggioli, Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Fabrizio Giunco, Marco Stramba-Badiale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 423 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 218 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Engineering | 18 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 14% |
| Unknown | 232 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,853,883
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,611
of 7,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,532
of 378,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#34
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.