↓ Skip to main content

Describing the Digital Footprints or “Sociomes” of Asthma for Stakeholder Groups on Twitter

Overview of attention for article published in ATS Scholar, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Describing the Digital Footprints or “Sociomes” of Asthma for Stakeholder Groups on Twitter
Published in
ATS Scholar, March 2020
DOI 10.34197/ats-scholar.2019-0014oc
Authors

Christopher L. Carroll, Viren Kaul, Kathleen A. Sala, Neha S. Dangayach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,207,637
of 14,669,094 outputs
Outputs from ATS Scholar
#11
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,783
of 222,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ATS Scholar
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,669,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.