| Title |
Breaking Groupthink: Why Scientific Identity and Norms Mitigate Ideological Epistemology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Inquiry, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/1047840x.2020.1722599 |
| Authors |
Jay J. Van Bavel, Diego A. Reinero, Elizabeth Harris, Claire E. Robertson, Philip Pärnamets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 31% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 13 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,104,036
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Inquiry
#88
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,406
of 388,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Inquiry
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.