The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 828 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1916903117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elli J Theobald, Mariah J Hill, Elisa Tran, Sweta Agrawal, E Nicole Arroyo, Shawn Behling, Nyasha Chambwe, Dianne Laboy Cintrón, Jacob D Cooper, Gideon Dunster, Jared A Grummer, Kelly Hennessey, Jennifer Hsiao, Nicole Iranon, Leonard Jones, Hannah Jordt, Marlowe Keller, Melissa E Lacey, Caitlin E Littlefield, Alexander Lowe, Shannon Newman, Vera Okolo, Savannah Olroyd, Brandon R Peecook, Sarah B Pickett, David L Slager, Itzue W Caviedes-Solis, Kathryn E Stanchak, Vasudha Sundaravardan, Camila Valdebenito, Claire R Williams, Kaitlin Zinsli, Scott Freeman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 281 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 3% |
| Canada | 25 | 3% |
| Australia | 12 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 3% |
| Unknown | 446 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 431 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 368 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1387 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 220 | 16% |
| Researcher | 123 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 6% |
| Professor | 85 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 79 | 6% |
| Other | 317 | 23% |
| Unknown | 477 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 111 | 8% |
| Engineering | 74 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 68 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 65 | 5% |
| Other | 410 | 30% |
| Unknown | 536 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 766. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#27,399
of 26,621,386 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#807
of 105,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,013
of 391,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27
of 937 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,621,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 937 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.