↓ Skip to main content

Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013181.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Gambir, Caron Kim, Kelly Ann Necastro, Bela Ganatra, Thoai D Ngo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#826,234
of 15,693,615 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,294
of 11,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,997
of 258,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,693,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.