↓ Skip to main content

Non-freezing cold event stresses can cause significant damage to mangrove seedlings: assessing the role of warming and nitrogen enrichment in a mesocosm study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Communications, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-freezing cold event stresses can cause significant damage to mangrove seedlings: assessing the role of warming and nitrogen enrichment in a mesocosm study
Published in
Environmental Research Communications, March 2020
DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ab7a77
Authors

Weimin Song, Jianxiang Feng, Ken W Krauss, Yan Zhao, Zhonglei Wang, Guanghui Lin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#9,217,618
of 15,799,061 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Communications
#59
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,140
of 260,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,799,061 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them