↓ Skip to main content

How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Political Science Review, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis
Published in
European Political Science Review, March 2020
DOI 10.1017/s1755773920000107
Authors

Henrik Serup Christensen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 48%
Engineering 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,987,665
of 17,730,520 outputs
Outputs from European Political Science Review
#69
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,200
of 271,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Political Science Review
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,730,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.