You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006029.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Omar M Aboumarzouk, Slawomir G Kata, Francis X Keeley, Samuel McClinton, Ghulam Nabi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 17% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 18% |
Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,943,688
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,207
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,205
of 177,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.