↓ Skip to main content

Impact on learning of an e-learning module on leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact on learning of an e-learning module on leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuri Morgulis, Rakesh K Kumar, Robert Lindeman, Gary M Velan

Abstract

e-learning resources may be beneficial for complex or conceptually difficult topics. Leukaemia is one such topic, yet there are no reports on the efficacy of e-learning for leukaemia. This study compared the learning impact on senior medical students of a purpose-built e-learning module on leukaemia, compared with existing online resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 28%
Social Sciences 24 19%
Psychology 9 7%
Computer Science 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,379,364
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,097
of 3,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,967
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.