↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Reinfection in Rhesus Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 134,247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of Reinfection in Rhesus Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.03.13.990226
Authors

Bao, Linlin, Deng, Wei, Gao, Hong, Xiao, Chong, Liu, Jiayi, Xue, Jing, Lv, Qi, Liu, Jiangning, Yu, Pin, Xu, Yanfeng, Qi, Feifei, Qu, Yajin, Li, Fengdi, Xiang, Zhiguang, Yu, Haisheng, Gong, Shuran, Liu, Mingya, Wang, Guanpeng, Wang, Shunyi, Song, Zhiqi, Liu, Ying, Zhao, Wenjie, Han, Yunlin, Zhao, Linna, Liu, Xing, Wei, Qiang, Qin, Chuan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9,773 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 529 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 4%
Researcher 19 4%
Student > Master 15 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 3%
Student > Postgraduate 9 2%
Other 23 4%
Unknown 429 81%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Engineering 4 <1%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 437 83%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#243
of 18,951,205 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#5
of 134,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 278,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#3
of 7,579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,951,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.