↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Reinfection in Rhesus Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 100,260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of Reinfection in Rhesus Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.03.13.990226
Authors

Bao, Linlin, Deng, Wei, Gao, Hong, Xiao, Chong, Liu, Jiayi, Xue, Jing, Lv, Qi, Liu, Jiangning, Yu, Pin, Xu, Yanfeng, Qi, Feifei, Qu, Yajin, Li, Fengdi, Xiang, Zhiguang, Yu, Haisheng, Gong, Shuran, Liu, Mingya, Wang, Guanpeng, Wang, Shunyi, Song, Zhiqi, Liu, Ying, Zhao, Wenjie, Han, Yunlin, Zhao, Linna, Liu, Xing, Wei, Qiang, Qin, Chuan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10,418 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 529 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 123 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 10%
Student > Bachelor 47 9%
Student > Master 42 8%
Professor 39 7%
Other 124 23%
Unknown 103 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 51 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 3%
Other 94 18%
Unknown 143 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7637. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#125
of 16,094,474 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#3
of 100,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 262,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#2
of 7,594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,474 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.