You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing a toolkit for engagement practice: sharing power with communities in priority-setting for global health research projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-0462-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bridget Pratt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malawi | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,223,188
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#743
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,431
of 366,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.