↓ Skip to main content

Benchmarking of computational error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benchmarking of computational error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing data
Published in
Genome Biology, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13059-020-01988-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith Mitchell, Jaqueline J. Brito, Igor Mandric, Qiaozhen Wu, Sergey Knyazev, Sei Chang, Lana S. Martin, Aaron Karlsberg, Ekaterina Gerasimov, Russell Littman, Brian L. Hill, Nicholas C. Wu, Harry Taegyun Yang, Kevin Hsieh, Linus Chen, Eli Littman, Taylor Shabani, German Enik, Douglas Yao, Ren Sun, Jan Schroeder, Eleazar Eskin, Alex Zelikovsky, Pavel Skums, Mihai Pop, Serghei Mangul

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Computer Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,047,129
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#754
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,172
of 404,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.