You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
真核生物の高次分類体系の改訂―Adl et al. (2019)について―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.19004/taxa.48.0_71 |
| Authors |
矢﨑 裕規, 島野 智之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 19 | 30% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 89% |
| Scientists | 6 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,099,061
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#3
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,359
of 477,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them