You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting Autophagy in Innate Immune Cells: Angel or Demon During Infection and Vaccination?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00460 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sha Tao, Ingo Drexler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,571,435
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,897
of 29,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,162
of 370,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#122
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.