↓ Skip to main content

Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
104 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats
Published in
Current Biology, April 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald G. Carter, Damien R. Farine, Rachel J. Crisp, Julia K. Vrtilek, Simon P. Ripperger, Rachel A. Page

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 526. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,782
of 15,124,696 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#176
of 10,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,086
of 255,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#6
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.