| Title |
Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald G Carter, Damien R Farine, Rachel J Crisp, Julia K Vrtilek, Simon P Ripperger, Rachel A Page |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 15% |
| United States | 16 | 14% |
| Germany | 6 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 48% |
| Scientists | 48 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 581. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#40,938
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#332
of 14,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,509
of 392,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#5
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.