↓ Skip to main content

A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 948)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
61 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health
Published in
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2020
DOI 10.1039/c9em00586b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darrin A. Thompson, Hans-Joachim Lehmler, Dana W. Kolpin, Michelle L. Hladik, John D. Vargo, Keith E. Schilling, Gregory H. LeFevre, Tonya L. Peeples, Matthew C. Poch, Lauren E. LaDuca, David M. Cwiertny, R. William Field

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Chemistry 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 59 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#473,414
of 21,774,582 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#20
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,664
of 293,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,774,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them