↓ Skip to main content

A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health
Published in
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2020
DOI 10.1039/c9em00586b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darrin A. Thompson, Hans-Joachim Lehmler, Dana W. Kolpin, Michelle L. Hladik, John D. Vargo, Keith E. Schilling, Gregory H. LeFevre, Tonya L. Peeples, Matthew C. Poch, Lauren E. LaDuca, David M. Cwiertny, R. William Field

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Chemistry 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 16 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,363,041
of 16,649,729 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#57
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,032
of 270,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,649,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them