↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of Hematopoiesis in Vitro with the Lym-1 Monoclonal Antibody

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, July 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of Hematopoiesis in Vitro with the Lym-1 Monoclonal Antibody
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, July 1991
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb17240.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. TUCK, M. SILVA, S. SORBA, A. GUHA, K. I. ABRAHAM, D. SCHOCHAT, N. DAINIAK

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,176,313
of 15,051,638 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#1,212
of 10,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,637
of 245,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,051,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.