You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving Generalization of Peer Socialization Gains in Inclusive School Settings Using Initiations Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Modification, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0145445512445609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynn K. Koegel, Sarah Kuriakose, Anjileen K. Singh, Robert L. Koegel |
| Abstract |
Social engagement by children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in unstructured school settings generally occurs at very low levels, if at all. Although many interventions improve peer socialization, generalization and maintenance of such gains when interventions are faded are typically low. The present study employed a multiple baseline design across participants to target generalization in the absence of interventionists in elementary school children with ASD at recess. Teaching initiations has been suggested as one method to increase generalization. The results of the present study showed that when initiations were targeted during intervention for social play, the participants demonstrated generalized peer social engagement, increases in unprompted peer-directed initiations, and more positive affect during peer interactions. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical and applied implications of incorporating initiations training into social interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Modification
#396
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,737
of 165,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Modification
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.