↓ Skip to main content

Economic valuation of health benefits from using geologic data to communicate radon risk potential

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic valuation of health benefits from using geologic data to communicate radon risk potential
Published in
Environmental Health, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12940-020-00589-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott J. Chiavacci, Carl D. Shapiro, Emily J. Pindilli, Clyde F. Casey, Mary Kay Rayens, Amanda T. Wiggins, William M. Andrews, Ellen J. Hahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,497,058
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#462
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,906
of 367,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.