↓ Skip to main content

Steady-State Visual-Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker for Concussion: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steady-State Visual-Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker for Concussion: A Pilot Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daryl H. C. Fong, Adrian Cohen, Philip Boughton, Paul Raftos, Joseph E. Herrera, Neil G. Simon, David Putrino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,666,021
of 25,304,569 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,836
of 11,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,142
of 369,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#191
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,304,569 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.