You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000475.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaity Ahmad, Kyungmin Kim, Matthew Thompson, Priya Agarwal, Helena O'Flynn, Akshay Hindocha, Andrew Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 90 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,373,497
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,719
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,449
of 392,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.